Designing for Change: Instructional Design in a Fluid Workforce

---

A reflective look at instructional design, adaptability, and preparing graduate students for a workforce defined by change.

Designing for Change

By 2026, careers aren’t linear. They’re fluid by design.

Graduates move between corporate roles, educational institutions, public organizations, and hybrid technology spaces often without changing their core professional identity. What changes is the context. The language. The constraints. The people in the room.

I’ve lived that shift myself.

Over the years, I’ve moved across sectors and roles, sometimes by choice, sometimes by necessity. I’ve worked in environments that prized speed and scale, and others that demanded deliberation, pedagogy, and care. The work looked different in each place, but the underlying questions rarely changed: What are we trying to accomplish? Who are we designing for? And how will we know if this actually worked?

Instructional designers live inside those questions every day.

Designing Across Contexts

Instructional designers no longer operate in a single lane. We move between environments that value very different things, and we learn to adjust, often quickly.

In corporate settings, I’ve had to translate learning goals into business language: performance, efficiency, outcomes, profit. In education, the conversation returns to access, assessment, and learner experience. In hybrid spaces, especially those experimenting with AI supported tools, the work demands restraint as much as innovation. Not just what can be done, but what should be done, and for whom.

This kind of adaptability isn’t cosmetic. It’s a professional judgment built over time. It’s knowing when to change the tool, when to change the approach, and when to pause the entire project because the question itself is wrong.

Context Over Tools

Like many instructional designers, I’m fluent in platforms, tools, and design frameworks. That fluency is necessary, but it isn’t what carries the work.

What matters more is context.

The longer I do this work, the clearer it becomes that instructional design sits at the intersection of multiple disciplines. Technology matters. Learning science matters. But so do ethics, organizational culture, change management, and strong (VERY STRONG) communication. Moving between sectors has made that impossible to ignore.

A solution that works in a corporate setting may fail entirely in an academic one. An innovative tool that excites one audience may alienate another. Designing effectively means holding those tensions without flattening them and making decisions that have real consequences for real learners.

Preparing Graduate Students for Change

These experiences shape how I think about teaching effectiveness, especially in graduate education. Preparing students for today’s workforce is not about training them for a single role or industry. It’s about helping them develop the confidence and judgment to move between roles, sectors, and expectations without losing their footing.

That requires more than content mastery.

Students need opportunities to test their thinking, revise their assumptions, and articulate how their skills travel. Graduate programs have to model that reality. Applied projects, cross-sector perspectives, and reflective practice aren’t add-ons; they are essential.

Designing the Future

The mission of instructional design education today is not to produce specialists for stable systems. Those systems no longer exist.

Based on my own movement through roles and sectors and now my responsibility for preparing others, I’m convinced the work ahead is to develop adaptable professionals. People who can evolve with and help shape the systems they serve.

Instructional designers aren’t just responding to change. We’re designing it. We’re leading it. We help people navigate uncertainty, translate complexity into clarity, and turn evolving systems into meaningful learning.

Patricia Baia, PhD, Assistant Dean of Teaching Effectiveness, Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center; Adjunct Professor, Instructional Technology Program, Touro University Graduate School of Technology.